Las medidas que nadie debería olvidar

Estrategias de seguridad recomendadas para el paciente

Identificar riesgos, determinar cómo medirlos adecuadamente y encontrar soluciones para reducir el daño en los pacientes.

Autor/a: Dres. Paul G. Shekelle, MD, PhD; Peter J. Pronovost, MD, PhD; Robert M. Wachter, MD; Kathryn M. McDonald y col

Fuente: Ann Intern Med. 2013;158:365-368.

Indice
1. Referencias
2. Artículo

1. Shojania KG, Duncan BW, McDonald KM, Wachter RM, Markowitz AJ.Making health care safer: a critical analysis of patient safety practices. Evid RepTechnol Assess (Summ). 2001:i-x, 1-668. [PMID: 11510252]

2. Shekelle PG, Pronovost PJ, Wachter RM, Taylor SL, Dy SM, Foy R, et al.Advancing the science of patient safety. Ann Intern Med. 2011;154:693-6.[PMID: 21576538]

3. Whitlock EP, Lin JS, Chou R, Shekelle P, Robinson KA. Using existingsystematic reviews in complex systematic reviews. Ann Intern Med. 2008;148:776-82. [PMID: 18490690]

4. Shojania KG, Sampson M, Ansari MT, Ji J, Doucette S, Moher D. Howquickly do systematic reviews go out of date? A survival analysis. Ann Intern Med.2007;147:224-33. [PMID: 17638714]

5. Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality. Methods Guide for Effectiveness and Comparative Effectiveness Reviews. AHRQ publication no. 10(11)-EHC063-EF. Rockville, MD: Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality; 2011. Accessed at http://effectivehealthcare.ahrq.gov/ehc/products/60/318/MethodsGuide_Prepublication-Draft_20120523.pdf on 20 July 2012.

6. Cochrane Effective Practice and Organisation of Care Group (EPOC) Reviews.Accessed at http://epoc.cochrane.org/epoc-reviews on 20 July 2012.

7. Harris RP, Helfand M, Woolf SH, Lohr KN, Mulrow CD, Teutsch SM,et al; Methods Work Group, Third US Preventive Services Task Force. Currentmethods of the US Preventive Services Task Force: a review of the process.Am J Prev Med. 2001;20:21-35. [PMID: 11306229]

8. Higgins JP, Altman DG, Gøtzsche PC, Ju¨ni P, Moher D, Oxman AD, et al;Cochrane Bias Methods Group. The Cochrane Collaboration’s tool for assessingrisk of bias in randomised trials. BMJ. 2011;343:d5928. [PMID: 22008217]

9. Shekelle PG, Wachter RM, Pronovost PJ, Schoelles K, McDonald KM, DySM, et al. Making Health Care Safer II: An Updated Critical Analysis of theEvidence for Patient Safety Practices. (Prepared by the Southern California-RAND Evidence-based Practice Center under contract HHSA290200710062I.)Rockville, MD: Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality; 2013. [Forthcoming].

10. Owens DK, Lohr KN, Atkins D, Treadwell JR, Reston JT, Bass EB, et al.AHRQ series paper 5: grading the strength of a body of evidence when comparingmedical interventions—agency for healthcare research and quality and the effectivehealth-care program. J Clin Epidemiol. 2010;63:513-23. [PMID: 19595577]

11. Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation(GRADE) Working Group. Accessed at www.gradeworkinggroup.org on 20 July2012.